Drug Therapy to Control Hypertension in Patients With Diabetes David S.H. Bell, MD, FACE |
 |
Cardiovascular Disease and Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Diabetes
Patients with diabetes are at especially high risk for cardiovascular
disease, including myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure. According
to the American Heart Association 75% of people with diabetes mellitus die
of some form of heart or blood vessel disease.
1 This figure is supported by
results of the Diabetes Mellitus Insulin-Glucose Infusion in Acute MI
(DIGAMI) trial, in which 66% of total mortality among diabetic patients was
due to heart failure.
2 Data have been widely disseminated showing that in
Finland, patients with diabetes who have had diabetes for 8 years with no
history of MI are at as great a risk of experiencing an MI as are
nondiabetic people who have already suffered an event.
3 However, data on
new onset patients from a Scotland study show that the risk in this group
is not as great.
4 In the past decade, nondiabetic patients have
experienced a significant decrease in mortality from ischemic heart disease
(men, 43.8% and women, 27%).
5 During the same period, men with diabetes
have experienced only a 16.6% decrease in mortality from ischemic heart
disease, while women with diabetes have experienced a 23% increase in
mortality from heart disease.
5 Clearly the cardiovascular risk factors in
the diabetes patient, including hypertension, are not being treated
intensively enough.
Etiology of Hypertension in the Patient With Diabetes
Patients with type 1 diabetes are at high risk of hypertension due to
nephropathy.
6 In addition, there is a direct correlation between the risk
of complications of diabetes and systolic blood pressure over time.
7 The
increased frequency of hypertension in patients with diabetes is
independent of age and obesity.
There are several causes for the increased hypertension in patients with
diabetes. Hyperglycemia plays a part. For every molecule of glucose
filtered and reabsorbed, one molecule of sodium is reabsorbed.
Hyperglycemia also glycosylates proteins, resulting in cross-linking of
collagen and premature stiffening of major vessels. Furthermore, people
with diabetes are more prone to atherosclerosis, and calcified atheromatous
plaques also leads to decreased elasticity of major vessels. Therefore, the
subject with diabetes has a higher incidence of systolic hypertension due
to this stiffening.
Insulin resistance also directly contributes to hypertension. High insulin levels result in:
- Decreased sodium excretion
- Stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system
- Proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells, which also have a high
sodium and calcium content. This leads to remodeling of the vessel wall
which results in left ventricular hypertrophy and more concentric left
ventricular geometry, associated with decreased myocardial function, and
is possibly why so many patients with diabetes suffer congestive heart
failure8
- Stimulation of the AT1 receptor
Hypertension is part of the insulin resistance syndrome, and occurs
independently of age, gender, weight, or blood pressure.
The Effect of Blood Pressure Control on the Risk of Complications
The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) contained a Blood
Pressure Control Study that produced very compelling data with regard to
hypertension in patients with diabetes. Tighter control of blood pressure
(144/82) versus less tight control of blood pressure (154/87) resulted in
substantial risk reductions, particularly for microvascular disease (37%)
(Figure 1).
7 The 47% risk reduction in visual deterioration is especially
noteworthy. Impressive risk reductions are also clearly visible for every
10 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure (Figures 2-4).
8
 |
| Figure 1. Blood pressure control study in type 2 diabetes. |
 |
| Figure 2. UKPDS. Epidemiological Study. |
 |
| Figure 3. UKPSD Epidemiological Study (cont.). |
 |
| Figure 4. UKPSD Epidemiological Study (cont.). |
The results of the UKPDS Blood Pressure Control Study illustrated that by
controlling blood pressure in patients with diabetes, the risk of
complications decreased.
8
The Hypertension Optimum Treatment (HOT) study showed that tight blood
pressure control is far more important and beneficial for patients with
diabetes than for nondiabetic subjects. The study randomized 18,790
patients with diastolic blood pressures of between 100 and 115 mm Hg to
groups with goals of ≤90, ≤85, or ≤80.
9 A comparison of patients in the 90
mm Hg and 80 mm Hg groups showed that those with the lower diastolic blood
pressure experienced a 10% reduction in cardiac events.
9 However, the same
comparison resulted in a 51% reduction in cardiac events in patients with
diabetes.
9
The data from these and other trials resulted in the blood pressure goals
for patients with diabetes currently recommended by the National Kidney
Foundation, American Diabetes Association, and the Seventh Report of the
Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, and Evaluation of
High Blood Pressure (Figure 5).
10-12
 |
| Figure 5. Blood pressure guideline comparison. |
Achieving Tight Blood Pressure Control
In order to achieve the above goals, most patients with diabetes will
require between 3 and 5 anithypertensive medications.
13 The
antihypertensive of choice for the diabetes patient is the ACE inhibitor.
The effectiveness of ACE inhibitors was shown in the Heart Outcomes
Prevention (HOPE) Study. Diabetes patients receiving 10 mg of the ACE
inhibitor ramapril per day experienced significant risk reductions in the
areas of all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and
cardiovascular death (Figure 6).
14 ACE inhibitors should be used
extensively, and a case can be made that every patient with type 2 diabetes
should be taking an ACE inhibitor.
16
 |
| Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves. |
Angiontensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) do not lower insulin resistance
as the ACE inhibitors do, but in patients with angioneurotic cough or edema,
ARBs should be substituted for ACE inhibitors. Since the effect of ACE
inhibitors is amplified with the addition of a low-dose thiazide diuretic,
thiazides should be taken in combination with ACE inhibitors. High doses of
thiazide diuretics increase insulin resistance, but conservative doses
(12.5 or 25 mg of HCTZ) have a negligible effect on it (Figure 7).
 |
| Figure 7. Emerging role of ARBs. |
There has been some controversy in the use of dihydropyridine calcium
channel blockers in patients with type 2 diabetes
17 (Figure 8). A possible
explanation of the increased risk of cardiac events or mortality in
patients with type 2 diabetes is the increase in the penetration of these
lipophilic drugs into the myocardium due to damage to the muscle membranes
from glycosylation (Figure 9). However, it must be emphasized that the
increase in mortality and cardiac events does not occur in nondiabetic
patients or diabetic subjects who are also on an ACE inhibitor.
 |
| Figure 8. Dihydropyridine vs nondihydropyridine. |
 |
| Figure 9. Calcium antagonists versus other antihypertensives.17 |
Used as monotherapy, β-blockers have been shown in older studies to
decrease mortality, in both the short and the long term, more in the
diabetic than the nondiabetic patients. These studies could never be
ethically repeated, so the question is whether β-blockers are as effective
with the availability of fibrinolytics and ACE inhibitors. β-blockers still
maintain an advantage, as was clearly shown in the DIGAMI study in post-MI
patients with diabetes, and in the Benzafibrate Infarction Prevention Study
in diabetic subjects with chronic ischemic heart disease. Therefore,
β-blockers are even more valuable in patients with diabetes than in
nondiabetic patients, and should be the drug used following an ACE
inhibitor and a thiazide diuretic. Unfortunately, first- and
second-generation β-blockers, by their vasoconstricting properties,
increase insulin resistance, triglycerides, serum glucoses, and lower HDL
and worsen peripheral vascular disease. Third-generation β-blockers, by
their α-1 blocking effect, vasodilate and thus lower insulin resistance,
glucose, and triglyceride levels, increase HDL levels, and peripherally
vasodilate. Therefore, a third-generation β-blocker such as carvedilol is
the preferred drug in the insulin-resistant and diabetic patient.
To review, the first step to achieving the blood pressure goals in a
patient with diabetes is to treat with the combination of an ACE inhibitor
or an ARB and a thiazide diuretic. If the patient fails to achieve the
blood pressure goal, a β-blocker should then be added. If the combination
of ACE inhibitor, thiazide diuretic, and β-blocker fails to achieve the
blood pressure goal, a nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker should be
added in addition to whichever antihypertensives are needed to achieve a
goal of 130/80 or below, or 120/75 in the presence of significant
proteinuria.
 |
| Figure 10. Choice of antihypertensive in patients with diabetes. |
References
- American Heart Association. 2003 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update.
Dallas, TX. American Heart Association; 2002.
- Malmberg K, Rydén L, Hamsten A, et al. Mortality prediction in diabetic
patients with myocardial infarction:experiences from the DIGAMI study.
Cardiovasc Res.. 1997;34:248-253.
- Haffner S, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects
with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior
myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:229-234.
- Evans JM, Wang J, Morris AD. Comparison of cardiovascular risk between
patients with type 2 diabetes and those who had a myocardial infarction:
cross sectional and cohort studies. BMJ. 2002;324:939-942.
- Gu K, Cowie CC, Harris MI. Diabetes and decline in heart disease
mortality in US adults. JAMA. 1999;281:1291-1297.
- Palmieri V, Bella JN, Arnett DK, et al. Effect of diabetes mellitus on
left ventricular geometry and systolic function in hypertensive subjects. Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Study.
Circulation. 2001;103:102-107.
- UKPDS Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and
microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective
Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317:703-713.
- Adler AI, Stratton IM, Neil HA, et al. Association of systolic blood
pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2
diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study. BMJ.
2000;321:412-419.
- Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effects of intensive
blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension:
principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomized
trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet. 1998;351:1755-1762.
- Bakris GL, Williams M, Dworkin L, et al. Preserving renal function in
adults with hypertension and diabetes: a consensus approach. National Kidney Foundation Hypertension and Diabetes Executive Committees Working Group. Am J Kidney
Dis. 2000;36:646-661.
- Position Statement. Standards of Medical Care for Patients with
Diabetes Mellitus. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care.
2002;25(suppl 1):S33-S49.
- Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the
Joint National Committee of Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and
Treatment of High Blood Pressure. JNC 7 Report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-2572.
- Bakris Gl. Maximizing cardiorenal benefit in the management of
hypertension: achieving blood pressure goals. J Clin Hypertens. 1999;1:141.
- The Heart Outcomes Prevention Study Investigators. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Lancet.
2000;355:253-259.
- Jonas M, Reicher-Reiss H, Boyko V, et al. Usefulness of beta-blocker
therapy in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and
coronary artery disease. Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1273-1277.
- Bell, DS. Should angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors be added to the water supply of patients with diabetes?
Endocr Pract. 2002;7:59-61.
- Pahor M, Psaty BM, Furberg CD. Treatment of hypertensive patients with
diabetes. Lancet. 1998;351:689-690.