Case 2: Treatment Options |
![]() |
There are few long-term advantages to adding a third oral antidiabetes drug (OAD). Although A1C may improve over the short term, physicians should remember that diabetes is progressive; at some point, it will likely be necessary to initiate some form of insulin therapy.3
In a study by Yale and colleagues, patients who were on metformin and sulfonylurea and had inadequate glycemic control were randomized to a TZD vs placebo. The mean A1C lowering in the TZD group was 1.4%; mean reduction in FPG was 50 mg/dL.4
Athough a 1.4% decrease in A1C is clearly beneficial, this would be inadequate in our patient, whose A1C at presentation is 8.8%. Prescribing a TZD in this case may decrease his A1C to 7.4%, but studies show that this may not take effect for up to 26 weeks.5 Since Mr. W. already has early neuropathy, retinopathy, and an FPG of 199 mg/dL, it is important to decrease his FPG more quickly. This option, therefore, would be suboptimal therapy, and optimal glucose control would not be attained. Please select another treatment option.
Back to “Case 2”